|
EDITORIAL
|
Survey Results – Part IVSix out of 53 respondents (11%) had had either RF ablation or maze surgery to eliminate LAF. One maze procedure was deemed entirely successful with no further episodes for two years. Two RF ablations were deemed successful with no episodes for 2 and 16 months respectively after surgery. One RF ablation prevented episodes for 8-10 months and was then followed by maze surgery, but it is too early to say if this was successful. One RF procedure was definitely not successful and one was done very recently so it is too early to tell. So at this point it really is not clear whether surgery is worthwhile. The success rate is probably highly dependent on the skill of the surgeon and the location of the misfiring cells. However, surgical techniques, especially for ablation, are constantly developing so hopefully the picture will become clearer within the next year or so. Thirty per cent of the remaining respondents had considered surgery, but not proceeded with this option. Four had had an electrophysiology study (EPS) with the results that there was nothing to ablate. Only three of all respondents had considered implantation of a defibrillator and none had proceeded with this option. Seventy-four per cent of all respondents had amalgam fillings in their teeth – an average of 10 fillings each. A preliminary look at the data shows that afibbers without amalgam fillings tended to have significantly fewer episodes than afibbers with amalgams (2 episodes versus 18 episodes over the past 6 months). This is indeed an intriguing clue that we will attempt to verify in phase 4 of the study. Most respondents (70%) had not had their amalgams replaced; 10% had done so and 6% were in the process of doing so. The remaining 14% did not have any to replace. Of the 5 who had had their amalgams replaced 3 followed up with a proper detoxification program. Here are their comments: Question: Have you noticed any difference in the frequency of episodes?
Forty-six per cent of respondents had dissimilar metals in their mouth and 46% did not. The remaining 4% did not know. It is interesting that 4 out of the 5 respondents with chronic afib did have dissimilar metals in their mouth. There was no significant difference in episode frequency between respondents with dissimilar metals and those without. Only 10% of respondents had had their intracellular magnesium level measured. All (100%) were found to have levels below the normal range. Seven respondents (14%) had had magnesium infusions. Three had felt a definite benefit, 3 some improvement, and only 1 reported no improvement; however, this person did not know if his magnesium level was low to begin with. Twelve out of 50 respondents (24%) reported that they were doing yoga or other relaxation exercises. Ten (83%) felt a definite benefit while 2 were not sure if they benefited. Thirteen reported praying or meditating on a regular basis and 77% found it helpful while 15% found it somewhat helpful. Seven (14%) of respondents had tried Traditional Chinese Medicine and 5 had found it helpful or somewhat promising. Thirty-six per cent of respondents jogged or ran daily, 31% walked daily, and 14% had a daily workout or engaged in swimming or golf on a regular basis. Only 7% did not exercise at all and 12% did very strenuous exercise on a regular basis. There was not a great deal of difference in the exercise pattern before and after the first LAF episode except that the proportion of strenuous exercisers dropped from 31% to 12%. Most (45%) considered themselves strongly athletic, 19% thought they were athletic, and 31% somewhat athletic. Only 5% considered themselves to be sedentary. The average pulse rate among respondents was 61 bpm (range 45-92), the resting systolic pressure 132 mm Hg (range 98-146), and the resting diastolic pressure 76 mm Hg (range 62-89). Only 7% of all respondents were taking medications for hypertension. Following are some selected comments on other questions asked: “What have you found is the best approach to limiting the frequency of LAF episodes?”
Adrenergic afibbers
Vagal afibbers
Mixed afibbers
“What have you found is the best approach to regaining normal sinus rhythm?”
|
The Mercury Connection
The Menace of Amalgam (Silver) Dental Fillings Mercury is a powerful neurotoxin and has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), heart attacks, manic depression (bipolar disorder), hearing loss, and depression and anxiety[1-9]. There is ample evidence that toxic mercury is released from amalgam fillings and readily enters the blood stream. It tends to accumulate in the brain and kidneys. A team of researchers at the University of Calgary did the original work in this area. They placed amalgam fillings in sheep and then measured how mercury levels built up in the various organs of the body. They found extremely high concentrations in the jawbones, gums, kidneys, stomach and liver[10]. More recently Saudi Arabian researchers reported that women with amalgam fillings had significantly higher mercury concentrations in their urine than did women with no amalgam fillings[11]. There is evidence that chewing and, to some extent, exposure to computer terminals and digital (cell) phones accelerate the release of mercury from amalgam fillings[1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) concluded in 1991 “The general population is primarily exposed to mercury through the diet and dental amalgams.”[12] Their estimates of the intake of mercury from various sources are:
These and other research findings have finally set off the alarm bells. Sweden and Austria have now completely banned amalgam fillings[1]. The New Zealand Ministry of Health is reviewing its policy on the use of mercury-containing amalgams for tooth fillings. This review comes hard on the heels of precautionary advice from the UK Department of Health, which warns pregnant women not to have amalgam fillings installed. Dr. Mike Godfrey, a leading environmental physician, points out that several major amalgam manufacturers have issued Material Safety Data Sheets and Directions for Use that clearly warn of the many dangers of amalgam fillings. Among the restrictions – amalgam fillings should not be used next to fillings or crowns containing other metals, they should not be used under crowns, they should not be used in patients with kidney disease, in pregnant women or in children aged 6 years or younger. The manufacturers also warn that mercury vapours from amalgam fillings can induce psychiatric symptoms in extremely low concentrations. Depression, mental deterioration, and irritability are among the symptoms listed[13]. The governments of the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom are dragging their feet on the issue. To admit that amalgam fillings are poisoning hundreds of millions of people every day would launch the biggest class action suit the world has ever seen – making the suits against the tobacco industry pale in comparison.
Amalgams and Lone Atrial Fibrillation My own feeling is that amalgam fillings can indeed be a major trigger to LAF in people who are sensitive to mercury toxicity. I recently made the observation that I had had a LAF episode within 2 days after each of my last 5 dental appointments to have amalgam fillings replaced. The LAF survey also pointed to a possible causative role of amalgams when it revealed that afibbers with amalgams in their mouth had nine times more episodes than afibbers with no amalgams (subject to verification in phase 4 of the survey). So if you are sensitive to mercury and have a high body burden of this toxic material, as revealed by hair analysis or urine test, what can you do?
Amalgam Removal
Some dentists also recommend an intravenous vitamin C drip during or immediately after the procedure and all stress the importance of ensuring an adequate intake of vitamins and minerals (particularly vitamins C, B- 2 and selenium) prior to and after amalgam removal. Contrary to popular belief, amalgam fillings covered with a gold or porcelain crown are not any safer than an exposed filling – they may actually be worse. Dr. Jack Levenson, a holistic dentist in London, UK recommends that amalgams be removed from the teeth in the following order[1]:
Having dissimilar metals (e.g. gold crowns and amalgam fillings) in the mouth can set up very powerful electrical currents that can directly affect the nervous system. A recent report from the Mayo Clinic relates the case of a woman with painful trigeminal neuralgia who was cured after removal of an amalgam filling situated next to a gold crown[16]. Closer to home, a LAF Forum contributor, Frank in Ireland, reported a complete elimination of ectopic (premature) heart beats within a couple of hours after removal of amalgam fillings in close proximity to a gold crown and bridge.
Detoxification DMPS (sodium dimercaptopropane sulfonate) and DMSA (dimercapto-succinic acid) are the two drugs of choice for mercury detoxification. They are not officially approved for this purpose, but are approved for the removal of lead, another heavy toxic metal. DMPS is usually administered via a slow intravenous injection while DMSA is taken orally. There is an on-going controversy as to which one is most effective. DMSA is claimed to be able to cross the blood brain barrier so theoretically should remove mercury from the brain. DMPS though may be quicker acting, but tougher on the system overall. Neither DMPS nor DMSA should be administered until ALL amalgams have been removed from the mouth. DMPS definitely and DMSA possibly get into the saliva and actually start dissolving the mercury from any remaining amalgams – not a good idea! Both DMPS and DMSA need to be administered by a physician or naturopath trained in their use. Close monitoring of mercury levels in the urine is a must. Natural detoxification is based on the use of intravenous vitamin C infusions and various sulfur-containing compounds. Sulfhydryl groups (sulfur) bind very strongly to mercury and the resulting compounds are eliminated in the urine or feces. MSM (methyl sulfonyl methane) and alpha-lipoic acid (thioctic acid) are both good mercury binders. NAC (n-acetylcysteine) also works, but may tend to spread the mercury around before eliminating it[1]. Most natural detoxification programs also include chlorella or seaweed that also tend to mop up mercury. Because the detoxification protocols all remove other metals it is essential that any regimens include supplementation with vitamins (especially B, C and E) and minerals (especially selenium, zinc and magnesium). Effective detoxification is absolutely essential if an amalgam removal program is to be successful, but it is a bit complicated. So for this reason it is best carried out with the guidance of an experienced naturopath or holistic physician. Should you have your amalgam fillings and dissimilar metals removed? If you can find a competent dentist and physician to work with you and you can afford the expense I would say “Go ahead”. If you are not sure, start out by having your mercury level determined through a hair analysis or urine test. If it is high or you have other symptoms of mercury sensitivity I would seriously consider removal even if you have to stretch the process out over a couple of years.
|
AFIB News
Genetic component discovered in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
Sex-related differences in atrial fibrillation
Echocardiography permits quicker cardioversion
Risk factors for atrial fibrillation
|
References
|
The AFIB REPORT is published monthly by Hans R. Larsen MSc ChE 1320 Point Street Victoria, BC, Canada V8S 1A5 Phone: (250) 384-2524 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.afibbers.org Copyright © 2002 by Hans R. Larsen
The AFIB REPORT does not provide medical advice. Do not attempt self-diagnosis or self-medication
based on our reports. |